Your Company Wasted Millions on AI While Sales Reps Keep Missing Quota

WIll Koning Author
by
Will Koning
Last updated on
14 Jan
3
min read

Here's the uncomfortable truth your company won't admit: they stopped investing in people.

Only 42% of reps hit quota in 2025. Your sales leader keeps rejecting your shortlists. The CFO is questioning your hiring ROI. 2026 is looking tough already

And everyone's acting like better AI tools will fix it.

They won't.

No AI tool does the job of being a good salesperson. No automation replaces proper hiring, training, and enablement. But your company spent the last two years throwing money at technology while cutting corners on the fundamentals: hiring better people and developing them properly.

Now sales leadership blames "the wrong hires." And guess who takes the fall? You do.

Even when Sales approved them. Even when you followed their brief.

The Problem: Your Company Stopped Investing in Hiring

Your company has been running the wrong playbook for years.

They cut training budgets. They rushed hiring processes to "move fast." They gave sales leadership vague mandates to "scale the team" without investing in proper hiring infrastructure or enablement. Then they bought AI tools and acted like that would fix everything.

It didn't.

Because here's what actually matters in sales:

  • Hiring better people. Not faster, not cheaper. Better.
  • Training them properly. Real onboarding that develops skills, not just product demos.
  • Enabling them continuously. Coaching and skill development that doesn't stop after month one.

These fundamentals haven't changed. AI doesn't replace them. AI amplifies them.

A great rep with AI tools becomes exceptional. A weak rep with AI tools is still weak, just faster at being ineffective.

But your company skipped the fundamentals. They hired quickly based on outdated criteria. They under-invested in training. Now quota attainment is stuck at 42%. And you're the one getting blamed.

What Actually Predicts Success

Our analysis of 500+ B2B sales organisations shows four traits predict first-year quota attainment better than experience or past performance.

These aren't "AI skills." These are the traits that make someone trainable.

Curiosity. Curious reps ask better questions, understand buyers faster, and actually absorb training. They want to learn your product, your market, your methodology. Non-curious reps just repeat what worked at their last company.

Coachability. Coachable reps take feedback, adjust their approach, and improve continuously. Uncoachable reps blame the product, the pricing, the leads, and never look in the mirror.

Grit. Persistence through the learning curve, through skill development, through the months where they're not yet at quota because they're still ramping. Reps without grit quit before they become productive.

Communication. The ability to explain complex ideas clearly, listen actively, and adapt messaging. This is what separates transactional sellers from consultative ones.

These traits determine whether your investment in hiring and training actually pays off.

A curious, coachable, gritty rep with clear communication can learn your product in 30 days and your methodology in 60. They'll absorb training. They'll implement coaching. They'll get better every quarter.

An experienced, confident rep without these traits will coast on old methods, resist feedback, and plateau immediately.

But your current hiring process doesn't measure these traits.

The Real Cost When Sales Hiring Goes Wrong

When the hire fails, Sales tells the CEO: "TA isn't delivering." Your credibility takes the hit.

But the actual problem is deeper: your company hasn't built the infrastructure to hire and develop sales talent properly. They want results without investment. They want great reps without great process.

And they've made that your problem to solve.

How to Fix It

Stop trying to fill a broken brief. Start fixing the brief.

Reframe the intake conversation. When Sales says "We need someone with 5+ years of experience," ask: "What specific situations will they face in their first 90 days? What skills predict success in those situations? How will we develop them?"

This shifts the conversation from credentials to capabilities and development.

Introduce trait-based screening. Share the four traits framework: "Research shows curiosity, coachability, grit, and communication predict quota attainment better than years of experience. These traits determine whether our training investment pays off. Should we screen for these?"

Use structured scorecards. Send shortlists with evidence: "Candidate A scored 8/10 on coachability based on specific examples of absorbing feedback and changing approach."

This protects you when hires fail. You had evidence. The decision was data-driven.

Build assessment into your process early. Use psychometric tests to identify learning agility before you invest interview time. Use video screening to assess communication clarity. Filter out confident candidates who can't demonstrate the four traits.

Where meritt Fits

We help companies invest properly in sales hiring fundamentals.

Yes, we use AI for sourcing efficiency. But the real value is our methodology for assessing trainability.

Psychometric assessments identify learning agility before you invest interview time. Video screening reveals communication clarity and structured thinking. Structured scorecards focus your interviews on evidence-based assessment of the four traits.

The result: you spend your time on final assessment of shortlisted candidates who've already demonstrated they're trainable. No more drowning in 200 generic applications.

We've helped companies reduce time-to-hire by 35% while improving first-year retention by 60%. By identifying candidates who will actually absorb training and develop skills.

Your Next Move

Your sales leader is about to start another req. You have two options:

Option one: Execute that brief. Send candidates who interview well. Take the blame when they don't work out 6 months later.

Option two: Lead the shift to proper sales hiring. Introduce the four-trait framework. Screen for trainability, not just credentials. Force the company to actually invest in people, not just tools.

Here's the reality: No AI tool does the job of being a good salesperson. The fundamentals still matter. Hiring better people. Training them properly. Enabling them continuously.

Companies that invested in these fundamentals are seeing results in 2026. Companies that skipped the investment and bought tools instead are stuck at 42% quota attainment.

Your company took the shortcut. They under-invested in hiring and development. They're paying for it now.

The question is whether you'll keep executing broken briefs and taking the blame, or whether you'll lead the fix.

meritt helps TA teams build credibility through structured hiring that works. Our process identifies curiosity, coachability, grit, and communication—the traits that determine whether your training investment pays off. We reduce time-to-hire by 35% and improve first-year retention by 60%.

FAQs

Why are sales reps missing quota despite AI tool investments?
Sales reps are missing quota because companies invested in technology while cutting corners on hiring and training fundamentals. Our analysis of 500+ B2B sales organisations shows that only 42% of reps hit quota in 2025, despite massive AI tool spending. The problem: no AI tool does the job of being a good salesperson. AI amplifies capability, it doesn't create it. A great rep with AI tools becomes exceptional. A weak rep with AI tools is still weak, just faster at being ineffective. Companies that rushed hiring processes, used outdated screening criteria (years of experience, previous quota attainment), and under-invested in proper onboarding and enablement are now seeing the results: stagnant quota attainment despite technology investment. The fix isn't better tools, it's better people and better processes for finding them. Companies need to screen for curiosity, coachability, grit, and communication traits that predict whether someone is trainable rather than credentials that look impressive on paper.
What traits actually predict sales quota attainment in 2026?
Research across 500+ B2B sales organisations reveals that four traits predict first-year quota attainment better than traditional criteria like years of experience or previous quota numbers: Curiosity determines whether reps ask better questions, understand buyers faster, and actually absorb training rather than repeating old methods. Coachability predicts whether they'll take feedback, adjust their approach, and improve continuously rather than blaming the product or leads. Grit means persistence through the learning curve and skill development phase, not just tolerance for rejection. Communication is about explaining complex ideas clearly and adapting messaging, not polished presentations. These traits matter because they determine trainability—whether your investment in hiring, onboarding, and enablement will actually pay off. A curious, coachable rep can learn your product in 30 days and your methodology in 60 days. An experienced rep without these traits will coast on old methods and plateau immediately. The challenge: most hiring processes don't measure these traits.
How can TA teams fix sales hiring when the company under-invests?
TA teams can lead the fix by reframing the hiring conversation and introducing evidence-based screening. Start by challenging broken briefs: when sales says "We need 5+ years of experience," ask "What specific situations will they face in their first 90 days? What skills predict success?" This shifts focus from credentials to capabilities. Introduce the four-trait framework—curiosity, coachability, grit, communication—which predicts quota attainment better than experience. Use structured scorecards that show evidence: "Candidate A scored 8/10 on coachability based on specific examples of absorbing feedback." This protects your reputation when hires fail because you had data, not just gut feel. Implement psychometric assessments to identify learning agility before investing interview time. Use video screening to assess communication clarity. The goal: become the expert who brings methodology to a process that's been running on outdated assumptions. Companies using trait-based screening see 35% faster time-to-hire and 60% better retention because they're finding trainable people, not just credentialed ones.
Why do companies blame TA when sales hires fail?
Companies blame TA when sales hires fail because someone needs to take responsibility, and TA is the easiest target. The reality: TA executes briefs that sales leadership provides, but those briefs are often based on outdated criteria that no longer predict success. When sales says "We need someone with proven quota attainment and 5+ years experience," TA sources those candidates. Sales interviews them, approves them, and hires them. Six months later the hire underperforms. Sales leadership tells the CEO "TA sent us the wrong people" even though they approved every decision. The actual problem runs deeper—the company hasn't invested in proper sales hiring infrastructure, structured assessment frameworks, or clear success criteria. They want results without investment. To protect your reputation: make hiring decisions evidence-based using psychometric tests, video screening, and structured scorecards that measure curiosity, coachability, grit, and communication. When hires fail, you can show leadership: "We had data showing specific strengths and development areas. Let's refine our criteria together." This shifts conversations from blame to collaborative improvement.

Ready to hire top talent faster, without the hassle?

Ready to Level Up?

Apply for jobs and complete your video introduction, where you can show your personality and communication skills upfront.

You'll get instant AI-powered coaching feedback to help you present your best
self and stand out from other candidates.