Stop Hiring Salespeople Who Know Your Product. Start Hiring Salespeople Who Can Sell.

WIll Koning Author
by
Will Koning
Last updated on
2 Mar
4
min read

75% of sales hires fail within the first year. Not because companies pick the wrong CV. Because they screen for the wrong thing.

If you are a founder making your first or second sales hire, there is a specific version of this mistake you are almost certainly going to make. You are going to hire someone who "gets" your product. Someone who asks smart technical questions in the interview. Someone who already understands your market.

It feels like the safe choice. It is the expensive one.

The mistake: hiring in your own image

Founders care deeply about what they have built. That is the job. But it creates a blind spot in hiring. You unconsciously weight product knowledge because it feels like alignment. A candidate who speaks your language, who understands your solution, who already knows the competitive landscape. That feels like a shortcut.

It is not. It is a vanity metric. It feels good in the interview and underperforms in the field.

A study of over 20,000 new hires found that 89% of those who failed did so because of soft skills, not technical knowledge. The pattern holds in sales. The candidates who impress founders most in interviews are often the ones who stall fastest in pipeline.

Product knowledge is learnable. Sales instinct is not.

The average new salesperson reaches full productivity in three to five months. For account executives selling complex B2B products, the Bridge Group puts it at 4.9 months. That is your ramp window. Your product can be learned inside it.

What cannot be learned in that window is the ability to handle rejection without losing momentum. To run structured discovery that uncovers real pain. To push back on a prospect without torching the relationship. To create urgency without being desperate.

These are years-in-the-making skills. You cannot teach someone to be curious, resilient, or coachable. So assess for what cannot be taught, and trust that what can be taught will be.

Look for demonstrated proof of learning

"Are they coachable?" is the right question. But it is too easy to fake in an interview. Everyone says yes.

The sharper question is: have they actually done it? Can they point to a specific moment where they picked something up from scratch. A new industry. An unfamiliar product. A sales motion they had never run before. And turned that into measurable performance?

That is the evidence. Push for it. Ask for the story, the timeline, and the numbers. Vague answers here are a red flag. You are not testing whether they can learn in theory. You are testing whether they have a track record of doing it under pressure.

At meritt. we screen for this specifically. Curiosity, coachability, grit, and communication. These four traits predict sales success far more reliably than product knowledge or years of industry experience.

Too much product knowledge makes you a presenter, not a problem-solver

Here is the trap nobody talks about. When a salesperson knows too much about the product, they default to answering questions rather than asking them. They show up to educate, not to diagnose.

The best salespeople sit in ambiguity with a prospect. They pull out the real problem before they ever mention a feature. Over-technical hires skip that entire step because they are too eager to demonstrate what they know.

You end up with someone who delivers a polished product briefing on every call. That is not selling. That is presenting. And presenting does not close deals.

Founder, you are already the product expert. That is not the gap.

This is the sharpest reframe. If you are the founder, you do not need a salesperson who knows your product as well as you do. You already have that person. It is you.

What you are missing is sales expertise. That is why you are hiring. A founder who optimises for product knowledge in their sales hire is essentially hiring a second version of themselves. When what they actually need is the skill set the business lacks.

You are not hiring a product expert. You are hiring someone to open doors you cannot open yourself.

What a great first sales hire actually looks like

They will not ace your product quiz. They will ask you questions about your customers that you have not thought of yet. They will have a story about the time they sold something they barely understood, because they were relentless about learning and sharp enough to connect the dots.

A bad sales hire costs roughly £150,000 when you add up salary, lost pipeline, ramp time, and the cost of starting over. That is six months of runway for most early-stage companies. The way to avoid it is simple. Stop screening for what you already know. Start screening for what you cannot teach.

FAQs

How do I assess sales acumen in an interview instead of product knowledge?
Focus your interview on demonstrated learning history rather than domain expertise. Ask candidates to walk you through a specific time they sold a product or service they initially knew nothing about. Push for the timeline, the obstacles, and the measurable outcome. Strong candidates will give you a detailed story with numbers attached. They will explain how they bridged the knowledge gap while still hitting targets. Weak candidates will give vague answers about being "quick learners." You should also test for structured discovery skills by running a live role-play where the candidate has to uncover a problem before pitching a solution. If they jump straight to features, that tells you everything you need to know.
What is the cost of a bad first sales hire for a startup?
A failed sales hire typically costs a startup around £150,000 when you account for base salary, lost pipeline revenue, onboarding and training investment, management time, and the cost of restarting the search. For early-stage companies, that figure often represents four to six months of runway. The damage compounds because a bad first hire also shapes your early sales culture. If your first rep cannot close, they influence how future hires perceive the role and the company. Research from multiple sources puts the total cost of a bad sales hire at three to five times total compensation when you include opportunity cost and pipeline damage.
How long does it take a new salesperson to learn a product?
The average new salesperson reaches full productivity in three to five months. For SDRs, the Bridge Group puts ramp time at 3.1 months. For account executives handling complex B2B sales, the figure rises to 4.9 months. Product knowledge is a component of that ramp, but it is rarely the bottleneck. Most competent salespeople can learn a new product well enough to sell it within six to eight weeks if they have strong onboarding materials and access to subject matter experts. The bigger variable is whether they have the sales fundamentals, discovery skills, objection handling, and pipeline discipline, to convert that knowledge into revenue.
What traits should I screen for when hiring my first salesperson?
The four traits that best predict sales performance are curiosity, coachability, grit, and communication. Curiosity drives a rep to learn your product and market quickly without being spoon-fed. Coachability means they will improve when you give them feedback, which matters enormously in an early-stage environment where the playbook is still being written. Grit determines whether they push through the inevitable rejection and long sales cycles that come with selling an unproven product. Communication is the ability to articulate value clearly and concisely. None of these traits can be taught. Product knowledge, CRM proficiency, and industry jargon can all be learned in weeks.

Ready to hire top talent faster, without the hassle?

Ready to Level Up?

Apply for jobs and complete your video introduction, where you can show your personality and communication skills upfront.

You'll get instant AI-powered coaching feedback to help you present your best
self and stand out from other candidates.